Editorial Policy
How Best Reaction Test researches, writes, reviews, corrects, and updates reaction-time content.
Purpose
Content exists to explain the tool, its limitations, and responsible interpretation. The primary keyword does not override accuracy: we do not invent statistics, rankings, credentials, reviews, or publication dates to obtain search traffic.
Sources
Technical claims prefer standards and official documentation. Scientific claims prefer peer-reviewed papers, systematic reviews, and primary research. A citation must support the nearby claim; a general bibliography is not used to disguise unsupported numbers.
Authorship
Site content is written and reviewed by Mikasa, the operator of Best Reaction Test, and articles carry a personal byline and review note. Review here means claims are checked against the linked primary sources before publication; it is not a claim that content has been medically reviewed. If a qualified independent reviewer is engaged in the future, their identity and relevant credentials will be shown explicitly.
Updates
A visible updated date changes only after a substantive revision to content, sources, calculations, or functionality. Cosmetic deployments do not justify a new content date.
Corrections
Confirmed errors are corrected in the source generator so every generated page remains consistent. Report suspected errors through the contact page and include a reliable source when possible.
AI-assisted work
Automation may assist research, translation, testing, or drafting, but published claims must be reviewed against sources and the working product. Pages should provide tool-specific value instead of mass-produced variations.
Independence and monetization
The site currently offers a free tool and does not use a third-party traffic analytics service. If advertising, sponsorship, affiliate relationships, or paid features are introduced, they will be disclosed without allowing commercial relationships to determine factual conclusions.