Editorial Policy
How Best Reaction Test researches, writes, reviews, corrects, and updates reaction-time content.
Purpose
Content exists to explain the tool, its limitations, and responsible interpretation. The primary keyword does not override accuracy: we do not invent statistics, rankings, credentials, reviews, or publication dates to obtain search traffic.
Sources
Technical claims prefer standards and official documentation. Scientific claims prefer peer-reviewed papers, systematic reviews, and primary research. A citation must support the nearby claim; a general bibliography is not used to disguise unsupported numbers.
Authorship
Pages are maintained by the Best Reaction Test Editorial Team. This is an organizational byline, not a claim that the content has been medically reviewed. When a qualified reviewer is engaged in the future, their identity and relevant credentials will be shown explicitly.
Updates
A visible updated date changes only after a substantive revision to content, sources, calculations, or functionality. Cosmetic deployments do not justify a new content date.
Corrections
Confirmed errors are corrected in the source generator so every generated page remains consistent. Report suspected errors through the contact page and include a reliable source when possible.
AI-assisted work
Automation may assist research, translation, testing, or drafting, but published claims must be reviewed against sources and the working product. Pages should provide tool-specific value instead of mass-produced variations.
Independence and monetization
The site currently offers a free tool and uses Google Analytics for usage measurement. If advertising, sponsorship, affiliate relationships, or paid features are introduced, they will be disclosed without allowing commercial relationships to determine factual conclusions.